Mind the registration gap
The High Court decision in Bennets Courtyard Limited v Bennets Courtyard Airspace Limited [2026] EWHC 1119 (Ch) provides an important warning for anyone preparing a collective enfranchisement claim where the freehold has recently been sold.
The case confirms that, during the period between completion of a transfer and registration of the purchaser at HM Land Registry—the familiar “registration gap”—the relevant freeholder for the purposes of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 remains the registered proprietor.
A section 13 initial notice served only on the purchaser awaiting registration will therefore be invalid.
That may appear technical. In practice, however, getting this wrong can cause the entire claim to fail.